Beyond the prejudice of philosophy

Translation of published article on Zinweb.
Having finished my master of philosophy at one of the Dutch universities, I often find myself confronted with prejudices against philosophy, both in the world and the job market. The discussion about closing one of the faculties of philosophy in the Netherlands (Earsmus University Rotterdam) has brought them all to the surface once more. Here is my response.

Philosophy? What? An area of expertise?!

Having recently decided to call myself a philosopher (see this article) I hear it constantly: everybody philosophizes, especially in a bar. Why study philosophy? As if someone can think better if he has studied philosophy in the classic setting with professors and students. But this way of thinking shows a couple of mistakes. (Maybe studying philosophy is useful to analyse them?)
Thinking is part of all areas of study. Just as philosophy forms an important part, maybe even the foundation of all areas of study. (All sciences were once part of philosophy, before they started to deal with the what-is instead of the why or what-could-be.) It’s not strange that several universities acknowledge this and make philosophy mandatory for all students. To make sure that everyone at least once thought about the fact that what-is and what-could be is not a given, but a notion developed and still constructed.

Philosophy is more than thinking

But the subject area of philosophy is much more than thinking. Thinking is only a very small part of a philosophical act. Being able to see and understand a paradigm, on a more than abstract level, is not something one simply starts doing. Besides that being able to share a thought is important: to be part of any discourse, knowing which words to use and which level of understanding to take into account. Which is more than simply being able to write.
Not all questions are good questions. Asking questions is always a good thing, but a good question distinguishes itself through its Vernunft, its reasoning-power, the insight that is conveyed by the question. It castigates premises that are often implicit. These are not things you learn by reading a book, by listening to some online Ted-talks or by having (good) conversations in bars. It requires something more. Which is where a university comes in. Or, where it should.

Job market? A philosopher isn’t necessary, right?

And if you say you’re working as a (freelance) philosopher, people look at you as if you’re joking. Philosophy is seen as completely unusable. I completely disagree. Everyone has different talents and possibilities, and the different areas of study make it possible for people to find a field in which his or her own talents can be developed and put to good use. The fact that some people passively study philosophy and don’t learn much from studying philosophy (or any other study) is not due to the field of study. Each education is only what you make of it yourself.
Besides, there has been quite some research done into philosophy majors and their earnings:  “Surprise: Humanities Degrees Provide Great Return On Investment” (Philosophy is the top earner or all humanities!). And philosophers are indispensable in boardrooms, according to successful (public) philosopher Alain de Botton.
Studying philosophy gives a lot of tools and possibilities that distinguishes a philosopher from other graduates. That’s why it’s not such a weird thing they end up in special positions. Scenario-writer of the Big-Bang-Theory for instance.

Philosophy outside of academia?! Yes!

One of the conclusions in present-day discussions regarding the closing of that university faculty with which I might agree: it might not be so bad. But that doesn’t mean I agree with the arguments given.
In order to develop Philosophy an academic structure is not necessary. A university probably isn’t even the ideal place for philosophy: it is a scientific world which is concerned with numbers and publications. Philosophy is not a science, and real philosophical thoughts cannot just be published in an academic article to be re-published and re-structured in order to generate as much publications as possible. Academic philosophy cannot be sad to take the lead in developing thought.
Perhaps a philosophical faculty is not necessary at all universities, as long as philosophy can be pursued outside of the academy. Important to note is that philosophical education should remain (or become) available for all students (which seems to be the case in the Erasmus University example).

Distinction with public philosophy

The closing of the philosophical faculty is understandable in this time, in which philosophy can take place outside of the academy. Which is why it is important to (continue to) develop philosophy, and perhaps subsidizing this by academic means is not the best way to do so.
It is however important to distinguish between professional philosophy and ‘public philosophy’. A distinction which is not a judgement, but a difference in development, goal and means. Philosophy books can become a repetition of all that is already thought on an underdeveloped level wherewith slogans form the main tone of argument. Which doesn’t mean that such books can be useful and helpful for some.
Reading thinkers like Martin Heidegger or Maurice Blanchot takes years: dedications, time and perseverance. And yes, those books are available everywhere in this age of information. But understanding them in this technological society in which everything needs to be fast, is not a small matter. To continuously push oneself to understand these thinkers, is not something everyone should occupy themselves with. For many and perhaps even for society it is even deemed useless. But that doesn’t make it superfluous that some dedicate their lives to it, in order to give something to the world. Let’s make sure that there will always be places where this can be done. Inside or outside the academic walls.
Wouldn’t it be lovely if everyone would occupy themselves with that, doing something for the greater good. In one’s own area of expertise, to make sure there are less (prejudicial) judgments about things people don’t know anything about.
But, unfortunately not everyone can and wants to study philosophy.

17 thoughts on “Beyond the prejudice of philosophy”

  1. “A university probably isn’t even the ideal place for philosophy: it is a scientific world which is concerned with numbers and publications. Philosophy is not a science, and real philosophical thoughts cannot just be published in an academic article to be re-published and re-structured in order to generate as much publications as possible. Academic philosophy cannot be sad to take the lead in developing thought.”
    —>It is an academic world which is concerned with numbers and publications. (The whole academia has been corrupted by that.)
    In my opinion Philosophy is the mother of structured thought and therefore it is the Mother of Science and a Science too. —> real meaningful Science cannot just be published in academic articles to be re-published and re-structured in order to generate as much publications as possible. With such a big value on the number of publications, Academic knowledge cannot lead in the development of anything other than the citation and creation of rubbish articles.
    Universities were supposed to be the institutions dedicated to the creation and distribution of knowledge, now it seems that they have been corrupted and turn into the institutions that refine the human raw material of the economical market, whatever that does not throw big numbers has no value in their system.
    Science including Philosophy indeed can take place outside of the academia, information is out there and almost everybody can get access to it, nevertheless it would be really nice to have a place where one could go and with the help of others be able to digest and create some meaningful knowledge. Apparently Universities are not that place anymore (probably never were).

  2. Pingback: Homepage
  3. I blog frequently and I seriously appreciate your information. The article has really peaked my interest. I’m going to bookmark your website and keep checking for new details about once per week. I subscribed to your RSS feed as well.

  4. Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site, how can i subscribe
    for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal.
    I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear idea

  5. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article.
    I will make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info.
    Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.

  6. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to
    be happy. I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you few interesting things or
    advice. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I wish to read more things about it!

  7. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good.
    I do not know who you are but certainly you are going
    to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  8. You really make it appear so easy with your presentation but I in finding this matter to be really one thing which I feel I’d never understand.
    It seems too complex and very wide for me. I’m looking forward to
    your subsequent publish, I will try to get the hold of it!

  9. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something informative to read?|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *